How the American’s Joseph Smith can be utilized by the Europeans to awaken the Muslims among them to the possibility of a fraud on the part of Mohammed’s Gabriel (but not on Mohammed himself).
Continue Leave a Comment March 24, 2016
A speculation as to how it could be that Jesus would not want to engage a stenographer. Mohammed had stenographers to insure that his actual spoken words would be recited correctly, by turning them into recorded words. Jesus did not. Why not?
Continue Leave a Comment November 13, 2015
A rearrangement of, and an addition to, the analogies used in the original essay on Abraham’s defense against Kant’s charge of immoral conduct.
Continue Leave a Comment August 16, 2015
A concise presentation of the elements in obtaining a paradise due to the sincerity of the conscientious Muslim martyr and aspiring martyr. Inspired by the troubled young Muslim of Chattanooga.
Continue Leave a Comment July 21, 2015
Suggestions for potential converts to Islam: Kant finds Islam an extortionist religion and I find it (but not necessarily Muslims) immoral in its core.
Continue Leave a Comment September 4, 2014
Kant considers Christianity to be fundamentally a moral religion, while Islam is extortionist. A discussion of this along with other concerns about Islam, and how Christianity and Islam can both assure the world that neither Christian nor Muslim may understand any alleged communication from God as calling for something understood to be immoral, e.g., the slaying of innocent children.
Continue Leave a Comment April 30, 2013
There are interesting parallels between the reports of the revelation of Mohammed and those concerning the American Prophet, Joseph Smith. And since they are contradictory, how can we tell which, if either, is reporting facts and not dreams or concoctions?
Continue Leave a Comment August 20, 2012
Thinking of Mohammed after hearing a recitation from Milton’s Paradise Lost.
Continue Leave a Comment December 24, 2008
The case of the Jewish/Christian Abraham is unifed with that of the Muslim Abraham for a single defense for the “true” Abraham. Abraham is innocent of Kant’s charges. He acted entirely for the sake of his son.
Continue Leave a Comment December 18, 2006
| M | T | W | T | F | S | S |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| « Jan | ||||||
| 1 | ||||||
| 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 |
| 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 |
| 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | 21 | 22 |
| 23 | 24 | 25 | 26 | 27 | 28 | 29 |
| 30 | ||||||